home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.c,comp.object,comp.software-eng
- Path: Utrecht.NL.net!news
- From: Rik Assen <rikassen@profline.nl>
- Subject: Q: Is Microsoft's Visual C & SDK best for developing c progs f W 3.11
- X-Nntp-Posting-Host: ah99-13.arnhem.nl.net
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- Message-ID: <3157899E.6CD@profline.nl>
- Sender: news@inter.NL.net (News at newsutr)
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Organization: Profline
- References: <1995Jul3.034108.4193@rcmcon.com> <3taaha$p8j@ixnews3.ix.netcom.com> <3taodp$859@saba.info.ucla.edu> <3tap9h$qp3@saba.info.ucla.edu> <314628F2.31C8@aud.alcatel.com> <31532d3c.2306796@netline-fddi.jpl.nasa.gov>
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Date: Tue, 26 Mar 1996 06:07:26 GMT
- X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Win16; I)
-
- I'm looking for some advice on selecting a C compiler for programs that can
- communicate both with the RS232 interfaces and Humans by click-clacking fancy
- windows, help files etc.
-
- Borland C++ 3.1 (which I used for dos for many years) is in my opinion not
- suitable for Windows development because of MANY books (about 15 cm for
- windows development alone) and not so much on-line / context sensitive help.
-
- Please send input/responses to:
-
- rikassen@profline.nl
-
- Thank you.
-